Utah Real Estate Practice Exam
A free practice test for the Utah salesperson exam, for the weeks before your test date, with an explanation on every answer.
Take the full test. Answers and explanations are shown when you submit, as on exam day.
A Utah violator knew the property owner was 70. What enhanced per-violation dollar alternative does the Utah civil-penalty provision use?
This practice exam is a study aid, not the real exam. Our questions are written by us to match the published content outline. They are not actual exam questions, no score here predicts a pass, and this site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by PSI, Pearson VUE, ARELLO, any state real estate commission, or any government agency. Your state commission and your candidate handbook are the only authoritative sources.
Utah real estate exam at a glance
| National questions | 80 scoredsource |
|---|---|
| State-law questions | 50 scoredsource |
| Passing score | 70%source |
| Time limit | 4 hourssource |
| Exam fee | $69.00 per attemptsource |
| Test provider | Pearson VUEsource |
| Retake wait | 1 dayssource |
| Pre-licence education | 120 hourssource |
Figures verified against official sources on . Exam fees and rules change. Check the linked source before you book.
10 sample questions, with answers explained
Every question above with its correct answer and the reasoning behind it. Read the explanations for the ones you answered correctly too. A lucky guess and knowing the rule look identical on a score report. These are sample questions from our larger bank.
1. A Utah violator knew the property owner was 70. What enhanced per-violation dollar alternative does the Utah civil-penalty provision use?
Why: The enhanced provision uses $10,000 per violation when the person knew or should have known the owner was at least 65 or a vulnerable adult. The question asks that dollar alternative, not every possible penalty calculation.
2. A Utah commissioner has served 2 consecutive terms and seeks another consecutive term. What statutory restriction applies?
Why: The Commission statute limits service to 2 consecutive terms. Continued eligibility for a license does not override that separate limit on Commission service.
3. A Utah licensee markets residential square footage obtained from a county record. Which disclosure obligation addresses the information's source?
Why: The rule requires source disclosure in the seller agreement and written buyer disclosure by the contractual deadline. Public availability does not remove those specific disclosure steps.
4. A Utah licensee relinquishes the license after committing misconduct while licensed. Does that end disciplinary authority?
Why: Utah Code 61-2f-404 preserves disciplinary authority for misconduct committed while licensed. Ending licensure is not a way to erase that conduct.
5. Which type of judgment can qualify within Utah's recovery-fund judgment categories, subject to the other statutory conditions?
Why: The statute recognizes qualifying final civil judgments and criminal restitution judgments for fraud, misrepresentation or deceit. The fund is not a general payment source for every unpaid business obligation.
6. A Utah licensee says a marketing team is exempt from advertising restrictions that apply to individual licensees. What does the rule provide?
Why: The advertising rule expressly extends the same restrictions to teams, groups and marketing entities. Organizing as a team does not create a separate exemption.
7. Before Utah limited agency proceeds, what must each principal acknowledge in writing?
Why: The limited-agency rule requires specific written acknowledgments of these limitations. It does not waive every obligation the licensee owes.
8. A Utah claimant has a final judgment only against a brokerage entity and seeks recovery-fund reimbursement under Utah law. What limitation applies?
Why: The statute bars recovery-fund reimbursement for a final judgment against an entity. The existence of a judgment does not by itself establish fund eligibility.
9. A Utah limited agent promises to advocate exclusively against the other principal. Which acknowledgment contradicts that promise?
Why: Each principal acknowledges that the limited agent acts neutrally to advance both interests. Exclusive advocacy against the other principal is inconsistent with that role.
10. A Utah seller demands a fixed net while the agent keeps any excess sale price. May the agent take that listing?
Why: R162-2f-401b prohibits taking a net listing. A seller’s suggestion does not remove the restriction.